Rajender has now issued an announcement of clarification by means of his spokesperson stating that the declare is baseless. “The distinction emerged between Mr Sonu Nigam and Mr Rajender Singh, as Mr Singh resisted working with one particular person known as Rocky and Mr Rehan Siddiqui beneficial by Mr Nigam to carry out at a live performance abroad. Mr Rakesh Kaushal (alias Rocky) and Mr Rehan Siddiqui have been banned by the Ministry of State for Dwelling Affairs, Govt of India,” learn the assertion.
Additional explaining why Rajender Singh Pahl resisted working with Rocky and Rehan Siddiqui, the assertion talked about, “The duo have been recognized for malpractices and supporting Pakistan-based terror teams as reported earlier in media. They’re blacklisted primarily based on suggestions of the Consulate Normal of India. It’s in opposition to the ethics of Mr. Rajender Singh Pahl to work with Anti-Nationals. He won’t work with anti-nationals even when they comply with work free of charge.” (A duplicate of letter by the Consulate Normal of India was connected to the assertion.)
The assertion additional denied the declare that Rajender is the cousin of BMC chief Iqbal Singh Chahal and said that they’re merely from the identical village in Rajasthan.
In response to the spokesperson, Rajender Singh Pahl has over twenty years of expertise in dealing with occasions and roadshows of Bollywood celebrities. He has labored with senior actors like Anupam Kher, Amitabh Bachchan (Unforgettable in 2008), Salman Khan, Shah Rukh Khan-Juhi Chawla-Kajol-Akshay Kumar (Superior Foursome in 1997), Anil Kapoor-Aamir Khan-Priti Zinta (Lagaan tour), Akshay Khanna and Aishwarya Rai Bachchan to call a couple of.
The assertion additional posed questions from Rajender Singh Pahl to Sonu Nigam, “Why does he insist that Mr. Rajender Singh Pahl work with those that are banned by The Authorities of India? Why does he need to work with Anti-national who fund and work with Pakistani terror teams? Does he have industrial ties and hyperlinks with them?” including that the ED or the IT division ought to examine the cash path of ‘terror funding resulting in Mr Nigam.’