“We have to respect science and respect the opinions and the conclusions reached by scientists,” Chinese language Overseas Ministry spokeswoman Hua Chunying informed a each day briefing in Beijing on Wednesday. “The WHO ought to play a number one position.”
In a separate briefing, Chinese language scientists working alongside the 17 worldwide consultants assembled by the WHO for the mission to Wuhan additionally defended the thoroughness of their findings and conclusion. Liang Wannian, an epidemiologist who headed the group of Chinese language consultants working with the WHO, stated the benefit of the report must be judged by scientists.
China’s feedback got here a day after the discharge of the long-awaited examine into the origins of Covid-19. The report, written after 4 weeks of investigative work within the mainland metropolis of Wuhan, drew widespread criticism from international locations together with the U.S., which referred to as it incomplete and overly managed by China.
WHO Director-Normal Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus unexpectedly additionally critiqued the report, saying it hadn’t sufficiently examined the controversial speculation that the virus may have leaked from the Wuhan Institute of Virology — the place researchers have been learning totally different coronaviruses, together with ones with similarities to SARS-CoV-2, which causes Covid-19. Bloomberg
“I am unsure how he understands the problem,” Liang stated of Tedros’s feedback. “Whether or not the examination was adequate or not must be judged by scientists and historical past.”
The coronavirus most likely unfold from bats to people by way of one other animal, in keeping with the WHO-China examine. The most efficient analysis can be to search for such an animal hyperlink, it stated.
Peter Ben Embarek, co-leader of the WHO investigation journey to Wuhan, has stated that the lab speculation wasn’t the primary focus of the investigation and so did not obtain the identical depth of consideration and work as different theories. .
Hua, the Chinese language Overseas Ministry spokeswoman, additionally pushed again at claims that Beijing had meddled and pressured scientists concerned within the examine and blocked them from having full entry to knowledge.
“They need to unfold rumors and push their hidden political agenda,” she stated. The consultants “stated they went to locations they wished to and so they met with folks they wished to.”