Delimitation Panel proposes 43 MLA seats in Jammu, 47 in Kashmir

0
28


Valley-based political events have rejected the Delimitation Fee’s proposal so as to add six meeting seats to the Jammu division and one for Kashmir. They termed it a biased course of geared toward serving the BJP’s political pursuits within the Union Territory.

The Fee shared its draft proposal on Monday, which has for the primary time, recommended reserving 9 seats for Scheduled Tribes and 7 for Scheduled Castes throughout Jammu and Kashmir.

The newest assembly happened in New Delhi with 5 affiliate members, together with two BJP Lok Sabha members from Jammu, and three National Conference Lok Sabha members from Kashmir who had earlier boycotted the Fee’s assembly.

The recent proposal will slim the hole of meeting seats between the Jammu and Kashmir divisions to 4 from 9 seats earlier. The entire variety of seats will enhance to 43 in Jammu from 37, whereas it would go as much as 47 in Kashmir from 46 earlier.

Hasnain Masoodi, the NC parliamentarian from Anantnag constituency in South Kashmir who participated within the assembly, mentioned that members have been proven a draft proposing six seats for Jammu and one for the Kashmir Valley.

“This proposal is completely unacceptable and is disproportionate as per the 2011 census; the Delimitation Fee requested us to submit our objection by December 31,” he mentioned.

The NC claimed that it could not be a signatory to the report. NC vp Omar Abdullah alleged that the Fee seems to have allowed the political agenda of the BJP to dictate its suggestions, fairly than arduous knowledge, which ought to have been its solely consideration.

“The draft is unacceptable…opposite to the promised scientific strategy, it is a political strategy (by the Fee) …The distribution of newly created meeting constituencies is just not justified by the information of the 2011 census,” Abdullah mentioned in a string of tweets.

Former J&Ok chief minister and Folks’s Democratic Get together president Mehbooba Mufti mentioned her apprehensions in regards to the Fee had not been misplaced.

“The Fee has been created merely to serve BJP’s political pursuits by dividing individuals alongside spiritual and regional traces. The actual recreation plan is to put in a authorities in J&Ok which can legitimise the unlawful and unconstitutional choices of August 5, 2019,” Mufti tweeted.

The central authorities had revoked J&Ok’s particular standing and the state was cut up into the Union Territories of J&Ok and Ladakh on that date.

The Jammu and Kashmir Folks’s Convention chairman Sajad Lone mentioned the suggestions of the Fee have been unacceptable.

“They (suggestions) reek of bias. What a shock for many who imagine in democracy,” mentioned Lone.

The J&Ok Apni Get together chief Altaf Bukhari additionally rejected the suggestions. “The present proposal stands in whole distinction to the method and pointers mandated by the legal guidelines governing delimitation within the nation…Authorities of India ought to alleviate the considerations of individuals earlier than the Fee’s report takes a ultimate form,” Bukhari mentioned.

It was additionally broadly criticised by civil society in Kashmir, with some even taking to social media to specific their considerations.

“These suggestions are neither based mostly on legislation nor logic. As per the inhabitants, Kashmir ought to have gotten round four to five seats whereas Jammu ought to have gotten 2 to three seats. Moreover, there’s a malicious intent behind carving new constituencies in Jammu, which can be dominated by a specific group,” mentioned Lateef ul Zaman Deva, a former bureaucrat.

In the meantime, the Fee has mentioned that it had categorised all 20 districts of J&Ok as per three broad classes – A, B, C – giving margins of plus or minus 10% of common inhabitants per meeting constituency, whereas proposing allocations of constituencies to the district.

“The fee has additionally for some districts proposed carving out a further constituency to stability the presentation for geographical areas having insufficient communication and lack of public conveniences attributable to their extreme remoteness or inhospitable circumstances on the worldwide border,” based on the official assertion of the fee.



Source link

HostGator Web Hosting

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here