Sanjeev Kumar was sentenced to 10 years in jail in 2013, together with former Haryana CM OP Chautala, within the trainer’s recruitment rip-off. CBI had booked a case towards Kumar in 2005 for ‘buying disproportionate property’ and his spouse and father for ‘abetting’ the crime.
Earlier than awarding the sentence, the courtroom raised eyebrows on the conduct of the CBI investigating officer for not questioning Kumar’s brother. The courtroom recorded that a few of the alleged disproportionate property, which embrace movable and immovable property, have been instantly linked with Kumar’s brother, who is predicated within the UK and a physician by career.
“Regardless of this, he (brother) was by no means related in any capability through the investigation. The investigating officer by no means bothered to look at him or query him. It’s fascinating to additional spotlight that two flats located in Vasant Kunj, New Delhi, have been bought through the verify interval, allegedly ‘benami’ by Sanjiv Kumar. One in all these was bought by accused Dr. Maheshwar Kumar (deceased father) whereas the opposite was bought by Dr. Rajiv Kumar (UK-based brother),” the order reads.
It provides: “Investigating officer made Dr Maheshwar Kumar an abettor by concluding that the flat bought by him was ‘benami’ of Sanjiv Kumar, Dr Rajiv Kumar was left untouched although the proof led was that it was Sanjiv Kumar who had paid all the quantity for each the flats… It remained an unexplained thriller as to why was the IO so type in the direction of Dr Rajiv Kumar in order to go away him out altogether from the ambit of his detailed investigation however scuffed Dr Maheshwar Kumar by his neck when the position of each seemed to be equivalent.”
It was CBI’s case that Sanjeev Kumar acquired disproportionate property price over ₹four crore throughout 1996-2005. His spouse’s position was that of “abetment”. Kumar’s father, a co-accused, expired through the pendency of trial.
“The alleged disproportionate property embrace quite a few financial institution accounts which had important deposits and withdrawals through the verify interval, large funding in shares, and appreciable immovable properties. The proportion of disproportionate property to the identified sources of earnings of Sanjiv Kumar was thus labored out at 570%, as alleged within the cost sheet,” reads the order accessed by ET.